The Trial of Socrates: Tied votes of judges (5 +5).

In 399 BC, Socrates in Athens is facing accusations that it does not respect the gods of the city, that introduces innovative demons that corrupts the youth of the city and discusses the "meteors" in the sky (the anti-gravitational vehicles of the White Brotherhood sprinkled on the black plague diespyre the Black Brotherhood) and those that exist beneath the earth (Nephilim). Adjudication by the Court of Elijah consists of 500 Athenian citizens.

About 2,500 years later distinguished senior judges and lawyers from Europe and the U.S. concentrated in the Main Stage of Arts & Letters Property to resume its historic trial of Socrates. Based on historical and contemporary sources and studies but also to the climate of today's public debates, the event explores the broad political and philosophical issues underlying the charges against Socrates and mainly stimulates reflection on current issues.
The judges and the public are invited to respond if Socrates was ultimately innocent or guilty. OPEN FOR ATHENS SOKRATOUS or?
Judges Verdict: For Athens: Ilias Anagnostopoulos, lawyer, associate professor of Criminal Law and Criminology Studies (Greece). Dr. Antonis Papadimitriou, lawyer, president of the Onassis Foundation (Greece)
Pros Socrates: Michael Beloff, lawyer (Great Britain). Patrick Simon, a lawyer (France)
5 to 5 in favor of Socrates and Athens. Verdict common room: 584 to 282 in favor of Socrates and Athens.
After Socrates was not unanimously acquitted, this means that our era is still run by the same quality world, like ancient Athens.

ellas news.net